During FAFSA processing, which criteria must be resolved if conflicting information exists?

The correct answer is grounded in the process of resolving conflicting information during FAFSA (Free Application for Federal Student Aid) processing. When discrepancies arise, there are specific criteria that must be clarified to ensure that the application is accurate and that eligibility for federal student aid can be properly determined.

Fraud is a significant issue that must be addressed whenever conflicting information is suspected. This is crucial because any indications of fraudulent information can severely impact a student’s eligibility for financial aid. Additionally, a judgment lien on property for debt owed to the U.S. is relevant since it indicates financial responsibilities and potential legal claims against a student, which can affect how a student is assessed for financial aid.

Also, simultaneous enrollment in an elementary or secondary school can create additional complexity when determining a student's status and eligibility for aid, as it raises questions about full-time enrollment in postsecondary education.

The presence of these criteria means that if any contradictions appear surrounding them during the FAFSA processing, they must be resolved to ensure the integrity of the financial aid system and the correct eligibility determination for students. Thus, the selection highlighting fraud, judgment liens, and enrollment status is the most relevant and accurate in the context of resolving conflicting information.